TL;DR
Get business pricing on garage and car supplies
- Business-only prices and quantity discounts
- Tax-exempt purchasing
- Multiple users, one account, clear invoices
A road.cc review found the Nutrak TPU tube weighs 56.8g and uses a metal Presta valve, positioning it as a sturdier-feeling option than very light TPU tubes. The reviewer reported no problems during testing but said the tube’s size, weight and price make its potential durability advantage hard to justify; long-term durability was not established.
Road.cc has reviewed Nutrak’s TPU inner tube, a 56.8g model with a metal Presta valve and a more substantial construction than lightweight TPU alternatives. The reviewer found it worked without punctures or other problems during testing, but said its added weight and packed size reduce the usual advantages of TPU; the test does not establish how it performs over the long term.
The tube is presented as a middle ground between traditional butyl and very light TPU models. At 56.8g in the review’s measurement, it weighed substantially less than the reviewer’s standard butyl tube, which came in at 138.4g. But it was heavier than the TPU comparisons: one standard-size tube weighed 27.8g and a gravel model for 40–50mm tyres weighed 48.9g.
Road.cc also found the Nutrak tube larger when packed than the TPU alternatives the reviewer had used. The reviewer said two standard TPU tubes could fit into roughly the same space as one Nutrak tube. That difference can matter to riders carrying a spare, particularly when storage space or carried weight is a priority.
The review’s practical assessment was mixed. The tube had no punctures or problems during testing, and the reviewer regarded its metal valve as a useful feature, especially for riders using electric pumps that may not suit plastic valve stems. But the reviewer cautioned that the test was not enough to make a firm claim about long-term durability. The product received an overall 5/10, with scores of 8/10 for quality and performance and 5/10 for value.
A Trade-Off for Spare Tubes
The review highlights a practical choice for cyclists: a tube that feels more substantial and has a metal valve, or a smaller, lighter TPU spare. TPU’s appeal over butyl often includes lower weight and compact packing. Nutrak retains some of the weight saving against butyl, but the review’s comparisons show that it does not match the lightest TPU options for either weight or storage size.
That trade-off may matter differently depending on a rider’s priorities. Someone concerned about handling a plastic valve with a particular pump may value the metal valve. Riders carrying several spares, or prioritising low weight, may prefer a lighter tube. The review does not show that the Nutrak is more durable in long-term use, so any durability benefit should be treated as a possibility rather than a demonstrated result.
Price adds to the question. Road.cc reported that two lightweight TPU tubes were available from some retailers for around £11, while the reviewer judged the potential durability advantage insufficient to make Nutrak an easy choice if two or three lighter tubes could be bought for the cost of one. Prices vary by seller and can change, so the review’s comparison reflects the market information it cited rather than a current universal price.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
How Nutrak Compares
The source is an independent product review published by cycling publication road.cc. Its disclosure says the review contains retailer links and that purchases made through them may earn the publication a commission; the publication says its reviews remain independent. The review assessed the tube’s construction, weight, pack size, use during testing and value against other inner tubes.
Nutrak’s product description, as reproduced in the review, says the tube uses lightweight TPU, a copper valve intended to improve strength and corrosion resistance, and a thicker construction intended to improve durability. It also claims high air retention compared with standard rubber tubes and compatibility with most Presta-valve pumps. Those are manufacturer claims; the review’s reported test did not establish comparative air retention or corrosion performance.
The review lists the tube at about 56g in the product information and records a measured weight of 56.8g. It compares that result with the reviewer’s own butyl and TPU tubes, rather than presenting a controlled durability study across products. The reviewer described the price as fairly typical in one rating response, while also questioning its value against cheaper lightweight TPU options.
“I had no punctures or problems with the Nutrak tubes during testing, although that’s obviously not enough to make any definitive claims about long-term durability.”
— Road.cc reviewer
Durability Beyond Testing
The review does not specify a test duration or mileage, and it reports no long-term durability results. Its puncture-free test period cannot establish whether the thicker construction lasts longer than lighter TPU tubes or prevents more flats. The manufacturer’s statements about air retention, valve strength and corrosion resistance are also not independently verified by the details supplied in the review.
The published material does not give a single verified street price for every retailer, and prices may differ by location and date. It also does not set out a controlled comparison using identical tyres, pressures, routes and riding conditions. Readers should treat the weight and size figures as the review’s measurements and comparisons, not as a universal performance ranking.
Check Fit and Current Pricing
The review provides no announced follow-up test or additional product update. Riders considering the tube can check current retailer prices, confirm that the size suits their tyre, and verify compatibility with their pump and wheel setup. Those weighing the durability argument against the size penalty may want to wait for longer-term testing, since the available review does not settle that question.
Key Questions
How much does the Nutrak TPU tube weigh?
Road.cc measured it at 56.8g. The product information in the review lists its weight as 56g.
What is different about its valve?
The tube has a metal Presta valve. The reviewer said it felt more robust than plastic valve stems on some lightweight TPU tubes, particularly when used with electric pumps. This is the reviewer’s assessment, not a test of every pump.
Did the review prove that it lasts longer?
No. The reviewer reported no punctures or problems during testing, but said that was not enough to draw a firm conclusion about long-term durability.
How does it compare with other TPU tubes?
It was heavier than the two TPU comparison tubes cited by road.cc, at 27.8g for a standard tube and 48.9g for a gravel tube designed for 40–50mm tyres. The reviewer also found the Nutrak bulkier when packed.
What rating did road.cc give it?
The review gave the Nutrak tube an overall 5/10, with 8/10 for quality, 8/10 for performance and 5/10 for value.
Source: rss
Halloween Picks
halloween
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
